<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telus to Start Charging; Bell Already Charging for Incoming Text Messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booerns.com/telus-to-start-charging-bell-already-charging-for-incoming-text-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booerns.com/telus-to-start-charging-bell-already-charging-for-incoming-text-messages/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocacy with less hand-wringing.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://booerns.com/telus-to-start-charging-bell-already-charging-for-incoming-text-messages/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booerns.com/?p=25#comment-17</guid>
		<description>But no one is forcing anyone to own and use a mobile.

And seriously, how large is the demographic which uses SMS often/frequently and does not already subscribe to an unlimited SMS plan?  Telus and Bell both offer unlimited messaging options for ~ $10 / month (last time I checked).

So really, what's the big deal?  It's not a "cash grab".  It's business.  Regardless of the reasons / excuses provided by the service providers, they have the power to decide what to charge for which service.

If a customer with one of these carriers wishes to not pay for incoming SMS, then get a phone without SMS, or simply have the service blocked on your mobile device.  If you're not paying for a plan already, you likely don't use it enough to need it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But no one is forcing anyone to own and use a mobile.</p>
<p>And seriously, how large is the demographic which uses SMS often/frequently and does not already subscribe to an unlimited SMS plan?  Telus and Bell both offer unlimited messaging options for ~ $10 / month (last time I checked).</p>
<p>So really, what&#8217;s the big deal?  It&#8217;s not a &#8220;cash grab&#8221;.  It&#8217;s business.  Regardless of the reasons / excuses provided by the service providers, they have the power to decide what to charge for which service.</p>
<p>If a customer with one of these carriers wishes to not pay for incoming SMS, then get a phone without SMS, or simply have the service blocked on your mobile device.  If you&#8217;re not paying for a plan already, you likely don&#8217;t use it enough to need it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://booerns.com/telus-to-start-charging-bell-already-charging-for-incoming-text-messages/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booerns.com/?p=25#comment-16</guid>
		<description>What really irks me about these text charges is that there is no alternative.  If you are contracted to a carrier, you are stuck with this new charge.

On the long distance side, I've stopped using Telus's long distance altogether.  I use Alligato long distance (http://alligatomobile.com).  Very reasonable rates.  I hate getting ripped off by Telus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really irks me about these text charges is that there is no alternative.  If you are contracted to a carrier, you are stuck with this new charge.</p>
<p>On the long distance side, I&#8217;ve stopped using Telus&#8217;s long distance altogether.  I use Alligato long distance (http://alligatomobile.com).  Very reasonable rates.  I hate getting ripped off by Telus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
